Legal Citation: The Bluebook
A practical reference guide to legal citation for law students, covering the most common citation forms you will encounter in your first year.
Learning Objectives
After completing this section, you will be able to:
- Apply Bluebook citation rules to cases, statutes, regulations, and secondary sources
- Use signals, parentheticals, and short forms correctly
- Distinguish between Bluepages (practitioner) and Whitepages (academic) citation conventions
Why Citation Matters
Legal citation is not merely a formality. It serves critical functions in legal writing and practice:
- Verification — Citations allow readers to locate and verify the authorities you rely upon
- Credibility — Proper citation demonstrates professionalism and attention to detail
- Authority weight — Citation format conveys information about the type and strength of authority
- Ethical obligation — Lawyers have professional duties to cite accurately and not misrepresent authorities
- Efficiency — Standardized citation allows readers to quickly assess sources without hunting for details
Citation Errors Have Real Consequences
Incorrect citations can undermine your credibility with professors, judges, and supervising attorneys. More seriously, misciting authority or using signals incorrectly can constitute misrepresentation. Courts have sanctioned attorneys for citation errors, and legal writing professors frequently deduct significant points for citation mistakes.
Bluebook vs. ALWD: A Brief Comparison
Two citation manuals dominate American legal writing:
The Bluebook
The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation is the most widely used citation manual. It is published by the law reviews of Harvard, Yale, Columbia, and Penn. The Bluebook is required by most law schools and courts.
ALWD Guide to Legal Citation
The ALWD Guide (formerly the ALWD Citation Manual) is published by the Association of Legal Writing Directors. It aims to be clearer and more user-friendly than the Bluebook while producing nearly identical citations in most cases.
Which Should You Use?
- Follow your professor's or court's requirements — When in doubt, ask
- Most law schools use the Bluebook — This guide focuses on Bluebook format
- Most citations are identical — The manuals differ mainly in organization and some minor details
- Courts may have local rules — Always check local citation rules, which may deviate from both manuals
Understanding the Bluebook's Structure
The Bluebook has two main sections that serve different purposes. Understanding this structure is essential to using it correctly.
The Bluepages
The Bluepages contain rules for practitioners—lawyers writing briefs, memos, and other court documents. Key features:
- Only two typefaces: ordinary type and italics (or underscoring)
- Case names, book titles, and article titles are italicized (or underlined)
- No large-and-small capitals (those are for law reviews only)
The Whitepages
The Whitepages contain rules for academic writing—law review articles and scholarly work. Key features:
- Three typefaces: ordinary type, italics, and large-and-small capitals
- Case names in footnote citations appear in ordinary type (italicized only in text)
- Book titles and certain other sources set in large-and-small capitals
For 1L Students
Most 1L legal writing courses teach Bluepages format because you are learning to write practice documents (memos and briefs), not law review articles. Always confirm which format your professor requires. This guide uses Bluepages format unless otherwise noted.
22nd Edition (2025) Highlights
The Bluebook's 22nd edition, published in May 2025, introduced several changes relevant to 1L students. This guide incorporates the most important updates, marked with a 22nd ed. badge:
- New Contrast ... with ... signal (Rule 1.2 / B1.2) — separates the "opposing authorities" function from the Compare signal
- "(Citation modified)" parenthetical (B5.3) — a single parenthetical replacing multiple readability-related parentheticals
- AI citation rules (Rule 18.3) — new Whitepages guidance for citing large-language-model outputs, AI search results, and AI-generated content
The 22nd edition also added Tribal law citation rules (Rule 22), archival source rules (Rule 23), mandatory internet-source archiving, and updated tables. For the full list of changes, consult the official preface.
How to Navigate the Bluebook
- Start with the Bluepages — Find the general rule for your source type
- Cross-reference the Whitepages — The Bluepages refer you to detailed Whitepage rules
- Check the Tables — Tables at the back provide abbreviations, court names, and jurisdiction-specific rules
- Use the Index — The back index helps you find specific topics
Citing Cases
Case citations are the most common citations in legal writing. Master these forms first.
Basic Case Citation Format
A full case citation contains these elements in order:
Full Case Citation Components
Case Name, Volume Reporter Page (Court Year).
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100 (9th Cir. 2007).
- Case name: Smith v. Jones
- Volume: 500
- Reporter: F.3d (Federal Reporter, Third Series)
- Page: 100 (first page of the case)
- Court: 9th Cir. (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)
- Year: 2007
Case Name Rules
- Use only the first party on each side (not "Smith, et al.")
- Omit "The" as the first word
- Abbreviate words listed in Table 6 (e.g., "Corporation" becomes "Corp.")
- Use "v." (lowercase, with period) to separate parties
- Italicize or underline the full case name, including "v.", in both textual sentences and citation sentences
- Be consistent: choose either italics or underscoring throughout your document
Common Reporter Abbreviations
- U.S. — United States Reports (Supreme Court)
- S. Ct. — Supreme Court Reporter
- F.4th, F.3d, F.2d — Federal Reporter (Circuit Courts)
- F. Supp. 3d, F. Supp. 2d — Federal Supplement (District Courts)
- Regional reporters: A.3d, N.E.3d, N.W.2d, P.3d, S.E.2d, S.W.3d, So. 3d
Court Identification Rules
- U.S. Supreme Court: Omit court designation (the "U.S." reporter indicates it)
- Federal circuit courts: Include circuit (e.g., "9th Cir.")
- Federal district courts: Include district (e.g., "S.D.N.Y.")
- State courts: Follow Table 1 for each state's conventions
Pinpoint Citations (Pincites)
A pinpoint citation directs the reader to the specific page where the cited material appears. Always include a pincite when referring to specific language or a specific point from a case.
Pinpoint Citation Examples
Single page:
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007).
Page range:
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105-07 (9th Cir. 2007).
Multiple pages (non-consecutive):
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105, 110 (9th Cir. 2007).
Short Forms for Cases
After giving a full citation, you may use short forms in subsequent references. The choice of short form depends on how recently and where you last cited the case.
Id.
Use id. when citing the immediately preceding authority (and only that authority). Italicize "id." and capitalize it at the start of a citation sentence.
Using Id.
Same page: Id.
Different page: Id. at 107.
Short Form with Case Name
When you cannot use id. (because an intervening citation exists), use a short form with the case name:
Short Form Examples
Smith, 500 F.3d at 107.
or
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d at 107.
Citing Statutes
Statutory citations identify the code, title or chapter, section number, and (for unofficial codes) the publisher and date.
Federal Statutes
United States Code (Official)
U.S. Code Citation
Format: [Title] U.S.C. [section] ([year if relevant])
42 U.S.C. [section] 1983.
18 U.S.C. [section][section] 1341-1343.
Note: Use the section symbol. For multiple sections, use a double section symbol.
Unofficial Codes
When the official U.S.C. is not current, cite to an unofficial code:
- U.S.C.A. — United States Code Annotated (West/Westlaw)
- U.S.C.S. — United States Code Service (Lexis)
Unofficial Code Citation
42 U.S.C.A. [section] 1983 (West 2024).
State Statutes
State statute citation formats vary significantly. Always check Table 1 of the Bluebook for the specific state's format.
State Statute Examples
California: Cal. Civ. Code [section] 1542 (West 2024).
New York: N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law [section] 349 (McKinney 2024).
Texas: Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. [section] 17.46 (West 2024).
Short Forms for Statutes
After a full citation, you may use short forms:
- Id.:
Id.orId. [section] 1984. - Section only:
[section] 1983.(if the code is clear from context)
Citing Constitutions
Constitutional citations are straightforward. Do not include a date for provisions currently in force.
U.S. Constitution
U.S. Constitution Examples
Article: U.S. Const. art. I, [section] 8, cl. 3.
Amendment: U.S. Const. amend. XIV, [section] 1.
Repealed provision: U.S. Const. amend. XVIII (repealed 1933).
State Constitutions
State Constitution Example
Cal. Const. art. I, [section] 7.
Citing Regulations
Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.)
C.F.R. Citation
Format: [Title] C.F.R. [section] [section] ([year])
29 C.F.R. [section] 1630.2 (2024).
Federal Register
Cite the Federal Register for proposed rules or final rules not yet in the C.F.R.:
Federal Register Citation
Format: [Volume] Fed. Reg. [Page] ([Date])
89 Fed. Reg. 12345 (Feb. 15, 2024).
Citing Secondary Sources
Treatises and Books
Treatise Citations
Single volume:
Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure [section] 1216 (4th ed. 2021).
Multi-volume:
5 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure [section] 1216 (4th ed. 2021).
Law Review Articles
Law Review Citation
Format: Author, Title, Volume Journal Page (Year).
Jane Smith, The Future of Contract Law, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1001 (2024).
Student-written: (add designation)
John Doe, Note, Privacy in the Digital Age, 98 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 500 (2024).
Restatements
Restatement Citation
Restatement (Second) of Torts [section] 402A (Am. L. Inst. 1965).
Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liab. for Physical & Emotional Harm [section] 3 (Am. L. Inst. 2010).
Legal Encyclopedias
Encyclopedia Citations
Am. Jur.: 6 Am. Jur. 2d Assault and Battery [section] 15 (2024).
C.J.S.: 6A C.J.S. Assault [section] 45 (2024).
Citation Signals and Their Meaning
Signals precede citations and tell the reader how the cited authority relates to your proposition. Using signals correctly is crucial—incorrect signal use can constitute misrepresentation.
No Signal
Use no signal when the cited authority:
- Directly states the proposition
- Identifies the source of a quotation
- Identifies an authority referred to in the text
Example: The court held that summary judgment was improper. Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007).
See
Use see when the cited authority clearly supports the proposition but does not directly state it. The proposition follows from the authority with an inferential step.
Example: Courts generally disfavor such agreements. See Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007).
See also
Use see also for additional authority that supports the proposition when other authority has already been cited. Often used with a parenthetical explaining the relevance.
Example: [After other citations] See also Brown v. Board, 450 F.3d 200, 210 (5th Cir. 2006) (reaching the same conclusion under Texas law).
Cf.
Use cf. when the cited authority supports a proposition different from the main proposition but sufficiently analogous to lend support. Always use a parenthetical to explain the relevance.
Example: Cf. Miller v. Davis, 300 F.3d 50, 55 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that similar conduct violated the parallel state statute).
Compare ... with ...
Use compare when juxtaposing authorities that are similar or that reach compatible conclusions, and the comparison itself supports your proposition.
Example: Compare Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d at 105 (applying the "actual knowledge" standard under federal law), with Green v. State, 200 A.3d 50, 55 (Md. 2006) (adopting a materially identical standard under state law).
Contrast ... with ... 22nd ed.
Use contrast when the authorities reach opposing results or take conflicting approaches, and the contrast itself supports your proposition. This signal is new in the 22nd edition (Rule 1.2 / B1.2); it separates the "opposing authorities" function that compare previously served.
Example: Contrast Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d at 105 (requiring actual knowledge), with Brown v. White, 400 F.3d 50, 55 (3d Cir. 2006) (requiring only constructive knowledge).
But see
Use but see for authority that clearly supports a proposition contrary to the main proposition. This is the negative equivalent of see.
Example: But see Miller v. Davis, 300 F.3d 50, 60 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that such agreements are enforceable).
But cf.
Use but cf. for authority supporting a proposition analogous to the contrary of the main proposition. Always use a parenthetical.
See generally
Use see generally for helpful background material. This is often used to cite secondary sources providing useful context.
Example: See generally Jane Smith, The Future of Contract Law, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1001 (2024) (discussing the evolution of contract doctrine).
Signal Formatting
- Signals are italicized (or underlined)
- Capitalize a signal only when it begins a citation sentence
- Separate signals of the same type with semicolons
- Separate different signal types with periods (new citation sentence)
Parentheticals: When and How to Use Them
Parentheticals appear at the end of a citation and provide additional information about the cited authority.
When Parentheticals Are Required
- After cf. and but cf. signals (explain relevance)
- For concurring or dissenting opinions
- To indicate the weight of authority (e.g., "en banc," "per curiam")
- When the relevance of authority is not clear from context
When Parentheticals Are Helpful
- After see also (explain the additional value)
- To provide relevant facts that make the authority more persuasive
- To indicate the holding or reasoning when not evident from your text
- To note important procedural posture
Parenthetical Format
- Begin with a lowercase letter (unless starting with a proper noun)
- Use present participle phrases ("holding that," "finding that," "noting that")
- Omit the subject (start with the verb)
- No period inside the parenthetical
Parenthetical Examples
Explanatory:
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007) (holding that employers must provide reasonable accommodations).
Weight of authority:
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc).
Concurrence/Dissent:
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 115 (9th Cir. 2007) (Smith, J., dissenting).
Quoting another source:
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting Brown v. Board, 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954)).
Quotations and Alterations
When to Quote
- The language is authoritative and carries legal significance
- The exact wording matters (statutory text, legal standards)
- Paraphrasing would lose important nuance
- The source's phrasing is particularly eloquent or memorable
Quotation Marks and Block Quotes
- Short quotations (under 50 words): Use quotation marks, run into text
- Long quotations (50+ words): Use block quote format (indented, no quotation marks)
Alterations
When you modify quoted text, you must signal the change:
Brackets [ ]
- Use to indicate changes to letters (capitalization, verb tense): "[T]he court held..."
- Use to add clarifying words: "The court held that [the defendant] violated the statute."
- Use to indicate changed letters: "The part[ies] agreed..."
Ellipses ...
- Use to indicate omitted words within a sentence: "The court held ... that the claim failed."
- Use four dots (period + ellipsis) for omissions that include the end of a sentence
- Do not use ellipsis at the beginning or end of a quotation (it's assumed you're excerpting)
Emphasis
- Add emphasis with italics and note "(emphasis added)" in the parenthetical
- Preserve original emphasis and note "(emphasis in original)"
Alteration Examples
Capitalization change:
"[T]he essential purpose of the statute is to protect consumers."
Omission:
"The court held that the employer ... violated Title VII."
Added emphasis:
"The statute requires actual notice." Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d at 105 (emphasis added).
The "(Citation Modified)" Parenthetical 22nd ed.
The 22nd edition introduces a new parenthetical — (citation modified) — under Rule B5.3. When you strip a quotation of internal quotation marks, brackets, ellipses, internal citations, or footnote reference numbers, or modify capitalization without brackets, you may use a single "(citation modified)" parenthetical instead of listing each change separately (e.g., "(internal quotation marks omitted) (citations omitted) (brackets omitted)").
- Use is optional. You may still use the traditional, itemized parentheticals if you prefer.
- Readability changes only. The parenthetical may not be used to flag substantive modifications to quoted text.
- Not "(cleaned up)." The Bluebook does not recognize the "(cleaned up)" parenthetical that gained popularity in practice. Use "(citation modified)" instead.
(Citation Modified) Example
Before (21st ed.):
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citations omitted) (brackets omitted).
After (22nd ed.):
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007) (citation modified).
Short Forms and Id.
The Id. Rule
Id. is the most common short form. Use it to cite the immediately preceding authority—but only if that citation contains just one source.
When You CAN Use Id.
- The immediately preceding citation is to only one source
- You are citing that same source again
When You CANNOT Use Id.
- The preceding citation contained multiple sources (e.g., a string cite)
- An intervening citation to a different source has appeared
- You are starting a new section or the document has a significant break
Id. Format
- Italicize (or underline) "Id."
- Capitalize when beginning a citation sentence
- For same page:
Id. - For different page:
Id. at 105. - For different section:
Id. [section] 15.
Other Short Forms
When id. is not available, use these short forms:
Cases
Smith, 500 F.3d at 107.500 F.3d at 107.(if unambiguous from context)
Statutes
Id.orId. [section] 1984.[section] 1983.(if the code is clear)
Secondary Sources
Smith, supra, at 1015.Wright & Miller, supra, [section] 1217.
Supra Limitations
Do not use supra to refer to cases, statutes, constitutions, or regulations. Use supra only for secondary sources like books, articles, and other materials. For cases, use the case name short form.
Common Citation Mistakes
Avoid these frequent errors that can cost you points or credibility:
Case Citation Errors
- Missing pincite: Always include a pinpoint citation when referring to specific content
- Wrong reporter: Use the correct reporter for the court level (U.S. for Supreme Court, F.3d/F.4th for circuits)
- Incorrect court abbreviation: Check Table 1 for proper abbreviations
- Using "at" incorrectly: Use "at" only for pincites, not for the first page of a case
- Forgetting party names: Always include at least one party name in text or citation
Signal Errors
- Using see when no signal is appropriate: If the authority directly states the proposition, use no signal
- Omitting parenthetical after cf.: Always explain the analogy
- Wrong signal for contrary authority: Use but see or contra, not see
Id. Errors
- Using id. after string cite: Cannot use id. when preceding citation has multiple sources
- Using id. across sections: Provide full citation at the start of new sections
- Forgetting "at" before pincite: Write "Id. at 105" not "Id. 105"
- Not italicizing: Id. must be italicized
Quotation Errors
- Missing alterations: All changes to quoted text must be indicated with brackets
- Improper ellipsis: Use three dots within a sentence, four when crossing sentences
- Block quote threshold: Use block format for 50+ words
- Missing attribution: Every quotation needs a citation
Format Errors
- Spaces in reporter abbreviations: "F.3d" not "F. 3d"
- Period placement: Periods go inside quotation marks in American English
- Section symbol: Use the section symbol ([section]), not "Section" or "Sec."
- Inconsistent typeface: Maintain consistent formatting (italics vs. underline)
Citation Tools
Modern legal research platforms include citation features. Use them—but understand their limitations.
Westlaw: Copy with Reference
- How to use: Click "Copy with Reference" on any document
- What it provides: Full citation in Bluebook format
- Limitations: May not match your document's format requirements; no pincites; may need editing
Lexis: Copy Citation
- How to use: Click the citation icon or use the Copy dropdown
- Options: Choose citation format (Bluebook, ALWD, etc.)
- Limitations: Same as Westlaw—always verify and add pincites
Word Add-ins
- Westlaw: Drafting Assistant can check and format citations
- Lexis: Lexis for Microsoft Office offers similar features
- Third-party tools: Various citation management software exists
Why You Still Need to Know the Rules
Tools Are Aids, Not Replacements
Citation tools make errors. They cannot determine:
- Correct signals: Only you know how authority relates to your proposition
- Appropriate pincites: Tools provide full citations, not specific page references
- Proper short forms: Context determines whether id. or other short forms apply
- Parenthetical content: You must explain the relevance of authority
- Local rules: Courts have jurisdiction-specific requirements tools may not reflect
Use tools to save time on mechanical formatting, but always review and correct their output. Your legal writing grade—and professional reputation—depends on accurate citations.
Recommended Workflow
- Research: Use platform tools to gather citations as you research
- Draft: Insert full citations with pincites as you write
- Review: Check each citation against Bluebook rules
- Polish: Verify signals, short forms, and parentheticals
- Proofread: Final check for formatting consistency
Quick Reference Summary
Essential Citation Components
- Cases: Name, Volume, Reporter, Page, (Court Year)
- Statutes: Title, Code, Section, (Publisher Year for unofficial)
- Regulations: Title, C.F.R., Section, (Year)
- Constitutions: Jurisdiction, Article/Amendment, Section
Signal Hierarchy (Supportive to Contrary)
- [no signal] — directly states
- See — clearly supports
- See also — additional support
- Cf. — analogous support
- Compare ... with ... — juxtaposes similar authorities
- Contrast ... with ... — juxtaposes opposing authorities 22nd ed.
- But see — clearly contradicts
- But cf. — analogous contradiction
- See generally — background
Next Steps
Continue building your legal research and writing skills:
- Citators — Learn to verify that your cited authorities remain good law
- Case Law Research — Master finding the cases you need to cite
- Secondary Sources — Understand how to cite and use secondary authorities
Check Your Understanding
- Write a proper Bluebook citation for a U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 2024.
- When would you use the signal see versus cf.?
- What is the rule for using id. as a short form, and when does it not apply?